Thursday, 26th of August 2010
A quick whiz around Google on the subject of "job hopping" presents
some rather contradicting articles, advice and opinions. One camp
back the belief that job hopping not only has no positive benefits
but also has detrimental effects on your career prospects. The
opposition argue that the exercise of job hopping displays an
eagerness to learn, a quick adaptive nature and independence, all
of which employers love. So let's look at the arguments on either
side, from the "pro-hoppers" and the "anti-hoppers".
Job Hoppers have Successful
Careers
The anti camp claim that this is not true. Apparently, a lot
of CEOs spent their entire careers at their company and that there
is a positive correlation between the time spent at the company and
the speed in which you get to the top of that company (and that
includes non-chief executives as well
.
The pros rebuttal to this is that focussing on executive
roles is looking at an older generation and that whilst this used
to be the case, nowadays and especially post-recession, it is not.
On top of this the pros argue that job hopping increases the
variety of work you have been tasked with making you more
applicable to higher, more well paid positions.
Employers are put off by Job
Hoppers
One of the most important quandaries that arises out of this
issue is whether a CV full of 18 month to three year positions puts
an employer off of hiring you. The logic behind this is quite plain
- they take one look at your CV and think "He/she will only be here
for a little while and then they'll be off and we'll have to do
this all over again!" However, statistics show that there are many
more temporary positions in recent times that are generated to fit
the peaks and troughs of business in the various industries. This
makes shorter positions look less odd and in some cases more
appealing because it shows a wide array of experience and a natural
ability to fit in to new environments.
Job Hopping reduces Benefits
To a degree this is true, and even the pros do not
contest this. Unfortunately for those who switch between jobs
often, many employee rights, such as maternity pay and pension
schemes, are not active until after a year of employment. So job
hopping can sometimes appeal more to the employer than the
employee.
However, in contest to this I would say that if you are to
engage in quickly shifting between jobs and companies then this is
something that should be done whilst you are young and trying to
build your career. Later in life you can settle down when you have
found a place you are comfortable with and have built up a skill
set and then start enrolling in various employee benefits.
In summary, job hopping is something that is "a good idea"
depending on the circumstances. If there are better positions with
more valuable experience and/or better pay elsewhere then of course
switching to that role would be a logical and sensible decision.
However, if there are many promotional opportunities at your first
or current workplace and you are enjoying your job (or at least
where it will lead) then why would you want to leave?
Comments
Something to say?
Add your own comment