Thursday, 12th of August 2010
If you were tuned into Channel 4 on Tuesday night you may have seen
Who Knows Best a show in
which two professionals were tasked with the assignment of getting
their candidate a job. The twist was that neither of these
candidates had done a day's work in their life, they were living
off benefits, abused drugs and were generally the epitome of a
"tabloid target".
Fortunately, both were in full time employment by the end of
the show. The younger of the two, John, who had poor GCSE results
as his only qualifications and virtually no sellable skills landed
a nice position as a forensic accountant. No, no, you don't need to
go back and reread that, that is right: he got a job as a forensic
accountant.
Granted, the position was only an internship but he received
free training and had the opportunity to get his placement extended
and eventually full time employment. Obviously, I have absolutely
nothing against this and it was quite a heart warming story to
witness - this down and out putting himself forward and committing
whole heartedly in order to change his life and prospects. Good on
him!
However, I couldn't help the sceptical lobe in my brain
kicking into overdrive. As a dreaded '09 graduate I know what it
was like job hunting in the midst of the recession, I also know how
many people would be aiming for John's position as a forensic
accountant - a lot. Furthermore, I
also know that many of
these would have been accounting graduates amongst others. I began
thinking if the TV crew hadn't been there would he really have won
that job.
On the flip side, he was very conversational and handled
(what we saw of) the interview well. He was asked difficult
questions about his poor academic performance as well as 'What have
you been doing with yourself for the past few years?', clearly a
hole in his CV which recruiters hone in on like hawks to a field
mouse. He answered these well, being honest about his past which he
"wasn't proud of" and then explaining how he no longer is that
person and is passionate and eager to learn and achieve. So maybe
this is a brilliant demonstration of how important good interview
technique is.
I think John's story for better or worse is a good account to
keep in mind. Whichever way you look at it, it shows that the
desirable jobs out there aren't unattainable and you should never
give up hope and get demoralised, no matter how seductive that
depressing voice in your head is.
Comments
Something to say?
Add your own comment